mirror of
https://gitlab.com/sdbs_cz/digital-garden-anabasis.git
synced 2025-01-22 23:57:06 +01:00
164 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
164 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
# fulldocs.twitter.zoomable\_ui
|
||
|
||
https://twitter.com/rsnous/status/1360841991383179266
|
||
|
||
> would it be right to say that "zoomable user interface" is 1. a complete success for maps and 2. a complete failure everywhere else? (if so, why?)
|
||
|
||
|
||
## links from thread
|
||
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOzmX2WpPZY
|
||
- https://dasher.acecentre.net/
|
||
- https://blogs.harvard.edu/sj/2012/03/14/britannica-goes-out-of-print/
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
## fucked copy of thread
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
](https://twitter.com/rsnous)
|
||
|
||
would it be right to say that "zoomable user interface" is 1. a complete success for maps and 2. a complete failure everywhere else? (if so, why?)
|
||
|
||
[
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
](https://twitter.com/gordonbrander)
|
||
|
||
One of my things is that the iPhone springboard is basically a simplified zoomable interface with two zoom levels. In the early days many of the icons intuitively read as mini cartoon versions of the app.
|
||
|
||
[
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
](https://twitter.com/rsnous)
|
||
|
||
!! it did immediately stick out to me that Table 1 in [library.tuit.uz/knigiPDF/Ebsco](https://t.co/JdDuTYYmMW?amp=1) used the iPhone app launcher as its example of ZUI on the iPhone -- it's certainly not what I think of when I think of zooming on the phone
|
||
|
||
[
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
](https://twitter.com/rsnous/status/1360994830734659586/photo/1)
|
||
|
||
[
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
](https://twitter.com/pkerpedjiev)
|
||
|
||
Nope. The standard way to view genomes is through zoomable user interfaces. See e.g.
|
||
|
||
[
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
](https://twitter.com/andy_matuschak)
|
||
|
||
The only other interesting example I can think of is treemaps in data viz. I think you're generally right, and the other examples people are offering in this thread really aren't what was meant by "zoomable user interface." Decent bibliography/review here: [library.tuit.uz/knigiPDF/Ebsco](https://t.co/3ojIrpc5il?amp=1)
|
||
|
||
[
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
](https://twitter.com/morganherlocker)
|
||
|
||
Few other digital objects can be subdivided so many times and still provide a useful chunk of information, viewed in isolation. Hard to imagine something like a CAD or a wav file where a 1/68 millionth (z18 of map quadtree) slice of the content is useful. [wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zoom\_leve](https://t.co/IvEGybXq3E?amp=1)
|
||
|
||
[
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
](https://twitter.com/TimSDobbs)
|
||
|
||
Maybe the way to think about it is that you zoom from factory>machine>part, or from discography>album>song>section>sample? We've parsed the fully zoomed-out version of maps, but not of other data
|
||
|
||
[
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
](https://twitter.com/Jermolene)
|
||
|
||
Maps have semantic zooming, the most important quality of ZUIs: the elision and simplification of information as you zoom out to maintain comprehension. I was very excited about ZUIs from following
|
||
|
||
’s work in early 2000s, feel disappointed we haven’t made more of them
|
||
|
||
[
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
](https://twitter.com/metasj)
|
||
|
||
Zooming through layered space, with compositing, tiling, and assigning a place + size + granularity to elements, is broadly useful but takes work to set up. Britannica Online attempted this for knowledge, but never launched.
|
||
|
||
[
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
](https://twitter.com/tylerangert)
|
||
|
||
Not sure if this was mentioned already but the iOS photos app is a pretty great ZUI imo (especially since it both zooms out to see more content and let’s you scroll through time at larger / smaller intervals).
|